Ideeleradio .- Presidential candidate of the Alliance for the Great Shift, Pedro Pablo Kuczynski (PPK) has no obligation to renounce his dual citizenship because the law forbids said Carlos Mesia Ramirez, president of the Constitutional Court (TC).
"The Constitution states as a requirement on nationality who wants to be president of the Republic must be Peruvian by birth, but does not prohibit dual nationality," he said on the program No Ideeleradio Law.
"If in any case the law or the Constitution does not prevent or say nothing, therefore we only ask [the candidates] to be Peruvian by birth and not have a single nationality: Peruvian- is the people who decide whether to elect a president with dual citizenship. Although PPK candidate has promised that if elected president would give up his U.S. citizenship, "he declared.
Fujimori hide his dual citizenship
Asked by questioning the candidate of the Alliance for the Great Shift, Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, scored unlike Alberto Fujimori, the former Minister of Economy has never concealed his dual nationality.
"Remember that Fujimori had dual nationality, but there is a difference with other candidates who might have it, basically Mr. Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, is that Fujimori always hid his Japanese nationality, however is public dual nationality PPK.
So from that perspective is a decision that people should take, "he said. He recalled that former President Fernando Belaunde Terry was born in Paris, but was registered in the Consulate of Peru. He said that the historic leader Popular Action never claimed any other nationality other than the Peruvian.
"[Fernando Belaunde] might also be claimed at the time the French at the beginning Iuris soli, [ie] acquire the nationality by where I was born, but to be registered with the Peruvian consulate in Paris He was a Peruvian by birth. Never claimed any other nationality. I say this as an example of a president born in a different place, always claimed his Peruvian nationality, "he argued.
Strife between ONPE and resolved in June JNE
The judge announced that in late May or June, will resolve the jurisdictional challenge raised by the National Office of Electoral Processes (ONPE) against the National Elections Jury (JNE), the electoral fringe administration and supervision of party funding.
"The first days of March, the Constitutional Court declared the application and has been served it to JNE who has 30 days to resolve. The JNE has not yet met to answer and I think your time should could you be winning the first days of April. After that date, the court must convene a hearing of the case which in our commitment must be seen in Arequipa. Then the view the cause might still be watching on April 20 and after that date, the Court would have 30 days to resolve. Would be talking about late May or June, in legal terms of deadlines met rationally, "he said.
0 comments:
Post a Comment